Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 6;2017(3):CD012031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012031.pub2

Saunders 1985.

Methods Randomisation and allocation concealment: random allocation was achieved by reference to a consecutively‐numbered series of sealed envelopes.
Blinding of outcome assessment: assessment of duration of gestation at delivery was made by labour‐ward staff who were unaware of the group to which individual women had been assigned.
Documentation of exclusion: no loss to follow‐up
Participants 212 women with a twin pregnancy around 30 weeks' gestation were recruited into the study
Interventions Women allocated to the intervention group were admitted to the hospital for bed rest from 32 weeks' gestation until the onset of labour
Women allocated to the control group were admitted to the hospital only if pregnancy complications occurred
Outcomes
  1. Gestation at delivery

  2. Birthweight

  3. Perinatal mortality

  4. Hypertension

  5. Pre‐eclampsia

Notes Chorionicity: not reported
Sample‐size calculation: reported, 100 women in each arm would have a 40% chance of detecting a reduction in the risk of preterm birth from 30% to 20%
Intention‐to‐treat analyses: performed
 Compliance: 11 women (10%) in the intervention group declined hospital admission and 2 women delivered before 32 weeks' gestation. In the control group, 58 women (54%) were admitted to the hospital before labour and 1 women delivered before 32 weeks' gestation
 Location: single centre in Harare, Zimbabwe
 Timeframe: no information
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Random allocation was achieved by reference to a consecutively numbered series of sealed envelopes." p 794
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding of participants and personnel was not possible due to the type of intervention (hospitalisation and bed rest compared with no activity restriction at home)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "Assessment of duration of gestation at delivery was made by labour‐ward staff who were unaware of the group to which individual women had been assigned." p 794
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up and analysis on an intention‐to‐treat basis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No study protocol available
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias

NICU: neonatal intensive care unit
 PPROM: prelabour preterm rupture of the membrane