Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;2017(2):CD012158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012158.pub2

STEP‐UP 2016.

Methods Randomized clinical trial. 2:1 allocation via block randomization. Follow‐up until 6 months.
Participants Baseline
Age: treatment 64 years versus control 63 years
Participants: treatment n = 46 versus control n = 24
% female: 52%
Disease distribution: heterogeneous
Baseline score on outcomes:
Mean FEV1 % predicted (SD): treatment 33.8% (8.2) versus control 33.7% (8.8)
Mean QoL in units total score on SGRQ (SD): treatment 57.7 units (15) versus control 57.3 units (20)
Mean RV % predicted (SD): treatment 235% (40.3) versus control 243% (45.1)
Mean TLC % predicted (SD): treatment 135.9% (14.6) versus control 136.8% (16.9)
Mean DLCO (SD): not reported
Mean PaO2 (SD): not reported
Mean PaCO2 (SD): not reported
Mean 6MWD in meters (SD): treatment 356 m (92) versus control 370 m (111.5)
Interventions Treatment with vapour ablation versus optimal medical care in concordance with GOLD.
Outcomes ‐ Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)
‐ St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
‐ Adverse events
‐ Other pulmonary function test parameters
‐ 6‐minute walking distance (6MWD)
Notes Funded by Uptake Medical
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Blinded blocked randomization scheme separated by site
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Blinding mentioned but no specifics reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open label, no mentioning of outcome assessment blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Attrition reported: balanced between groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Protocol published
Other bias Low risk No other risk of bias found