Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 24;2016(11):CD002200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub3
Methods This is a phase III open‐labelled, multicentre, multidisciplinary, randomised study, comparing 2 arms of 188 participants (i.e. 376 total participants).
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • Signed and dated written informed consent

  • Confirmed stage II or III (TNM)

  • Participant with curative surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma

  • Total digestive endoscopy prior surgery or postsurgery

  • Age > 18 years old

  • Normal liver ultrasound and chest X‐ray or thoraco‐abdomino pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan

  • In fertile women, efficient contraception or postmenopausal participant (amenorrhoea for at least 1 year)


Exclusion criteria
  • Serious concomitant pathology

  • Uncontrolled diabetes with a classical treatment (glycaemia > 1.4 g/l)

  • Other malignancy within the last 5 years (except for curatively treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ cervical carcinoma)

  • Uncontrolled infection

  • Women who are pregnant or lactating

  • Inability to understand informed consent

  • Psychological or geographic impossibility to follow up for 3 years

Interventions
  • PET

Outcomes
  • Evaluation of overall survival in the 2 groups

  • Evaluation of the rate of curative surgery

  • Comparison of the medical cost in the 2 detection strategies

Notes Study start date: February 2004
Study completion date: April 2013
No study results are published yet.