| Methods |
This is a phase III open‐labelled, multicentre, multidisciplinary, randomised study, comparing 2 arms of 188 participants (i.e. 376 total participants). |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Signed and dated written informed consent
Confirmed stage II or III (TNM)
Participant with curative surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma
Total digestive endoscopy prior surgery or postsurgery
Age > 18 years old
Normal liver ultrasound and chest X‐ray or thoraco‐abdomino pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan
In fertile women, efficient contraception or postmenopausal participant (amenorrhoea for at least 1 year)
Exclusion criteria
Serious concomitant pathology
Uncontrolled diabetes with a classical treatment (glycaemia > 1.4 g/l)
Other malignancy within the last 5 years (except for curatively treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ cervical carcinoma)
Uncontrolled infection
Women who are pregnant or lactating
Inability to understand informed consent
Psychological or geographic impossibility to follow up for 3 years
|
| Interventions |
|
| Outcomes |
Evaluation of overall survival in the 2 groups
Evaluation of the rate of curative surgery
Comparison of the medical cost in the 2 detection strategies
|
| Notes |
Study start date: February 2004 Study completion date: April 2013 No study results are published yet. |