Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;2017(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4

Adachi 1997.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: ITS
Risk of Bias: MEDIUM
Participants PROVIDERS: all physicians in the hospital
 PARTICIPANTS: all patients in the hospital
 CLINICAL PROBLEM: patients requiring antibiotic treatment
 SETTING: single hospital in the USA
Interventions FORMAT, Interventions: dissemination of educational materials; educational outreach by review and recommend change; reminders (physical ‐ newsletter)
Intervention Functions: education, enablement, environmental restructuring, persuasion
DELIVERER: pharmacist
 COMPARISON: usual care
 DESIRED CHANGE: decrease excessive
Outcomes PRESCRIBING: Choice: reduce vancomycin prescribing and increase appropriate use of vancomycin
COST: valid financial savings
Notes FINANCIAL SUPPORT: no information provided
ADDITIONAL DATA: no response from authors to request for additional data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Intervention independent (ITS) ? Low risk > 1 year data pre‐ and postintervention
Analysed appropriately (ITS) ? Low risk Re‐analysed. Not done in original paper (comparison of means, uncontrolled before and after).
Shape of effect pre‐specified (ITS) ? Low risk Done, intended effect was decrease in primary outcome, and point of analysis was point of intervention.
Unlikely to affect data collection (ITS) ? Low risk Done, data were from routine systems and unlikely to change over study period.
Knowledge of the allocation adequately prevented(ITS)? Low risk Done, data were from routine systems and unlikely to change over study period.
Incomplete outcome data addressed (ITS) ? Low risk Done, data were from routine systems and unlikely to change over study period.
Free of selected reporting (ITS) ? Low risk Done, data were from routine systems and unlikely to change over study period.
Free of other bias (ITS) ? Unclear risk Not clear, no information about changes in price of vancomycin over the study period.