Fowler 2007.
Methods | STUDY DESIGN: ITS Risk of Bias: MEDIUM |
|
Participants | PROVIDERS: physicians in the hospital
PARTICIPANTS: patients 80 years and older CLINICAL PROBLEM: Clostridium difficile infection in the elderly SETTING: 3 acute medical wards for the elderly in 1 university hospital in the UK |
|
Interventions | FORMAT: Interventions: audit and feedback, dissemination of guideline; reminders (physical, laminated pocket version of guideline) Intervention Functions: education, enablement, environmental restructuring DELIVERER: AMT COMPARISON: usual care DESIRED CHANGE: reduce inappropriate |
|
Outcomes | PRESCRIBING: Choice: monthly use of target antibiotics MICROBIAL: monthly count of cases of CDI |
|
Notes | FINANCIAL SUPPORT: no funding. Competing Interests: none declared ADDITIONAL DATA: email response from authors but no additional data Microbial Risk of Bias LOW: Planned intervention: Low Case definition: Low, National definition. Other infection control measures: Low |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Intervention independent (ITS) ? | High risk | Ongoing audit and feedback |
Analysed appropriately (ITS) ? | Low risk | Re‐analysed |
Shape of effect pre‐specified (ITS) ? | Low risk | Done. Point of analysis is point of the intervention. |
Unlikely to affect data collection (ITS) ? | Low risk | Done, data were from routine systems and unlikely to change over study period. |
Knowledge of the allocation adequately prevented(ITS)? | High risk | No, not possible |
Incomplete outcome data addressed (ITS) ? | Low risk | Done, data were from routine systems so unlikely to be incomplete. |
Free of selected reporting (ITS) ? | Low risk | Done, Figures 3 and 4 |
Free of other bias (ITS) ? | Low risk | > 1 year data pre‐ and postintervention |