Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;2017(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4

Lee 1995.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: ITS
Risk of Bias: MEDIUM
Participants PROVIDERS: physicians
 PATIENTS: a total of 480 patients reviewed during study period
CLINICAL PROBLEM: patients receiving ceftriaxone
SETTING: a hospital in the USA
Interventions FORMAT: Interventions: educational meetings with dissemination of guidelines; reminders (circumstantial and physical, letters sent to physicians when intervention needed plus posters)
 Intervention Functions: education, enablement, environmental restructuring, persuasion
DELIVERER: AMT
COMPARISON: usual care
DESIRED CHANGE: decrease excessive
Outcomes PRESCRIBING: Choice: grams of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime
FINANCIAL: cost of intervention (0.5 FTE ID physician and savings on drug costs)
Notes FINANCIAL SUPPORT: no information
ADDITIONAL DATA: no response from authors to request for additional data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Intervention independent (ITS) ? Low risk  
Analysed appropriately (ITS) ? Low risk Re‐analysed
Shape of effect pre‐specified (ITS) ? Low risk Point of intervention was point of analysis.
Unlikely to affect data collection (ITS) ? Low risk Data from pharmacy computer
Knowledge of the allocation adequately prevented(ITS)? Low risk Data from pharmacy computer
Incomplete outcome data addressed (ITS) ? Low risk Data from pharmacy computer
Free of selected reporting (ITS) ? Low risk Data from pharmacy computer
Free of other bias (ITS) ? High risk > 1 year data pre‐ and postintervention, but only 4 postintervention time points (quarterly data)