Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;2017(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4

Schouten 2007.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: cluster RCT, hospital level
Risk of Bias: MEDIUM
Participants PROVIDERS: all physicians
 PARTICIPANTS: 827 patients with lower respiratory tract infection (before intervention, 212 intervention, 166 control; after intervention, 276 intervention, 166 control). 6 clusters (hospitals)
 CLINICAL PROBLEM: patients with lower respiratory tract infection
 SETTING: 6 hospitals in the Netherlands
Interventions FORMAT: Interventions: audit and feedback; educational meetings with dissemination of guideline; educational outreach by academic detailing; reminders (physical, desktop on computers, and pocket card)
 Intervention Functions: education, enablement, environmental restructuring, persuasion
 DELIVERER: AMT
 COMPARISON: usual care
 DESIRED CHANGE: decrease excessive (choice and streamlining) and increase effective (timeliness)
POWER CALCULATION: no information
Outcomes PRESCRIBING: Choice: % patients compliant with guideline for selected drug, timing (within 4 h of presentation), switching from IV to oral and streamlining
CLINICAL: Balancing: mortality, length of stay
Notes FINANCIAL SUPPORT: Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (Zon/Mw; 2300.0024). Competing Interests: none declared
ADDITIONAL DATA: no response from authors to request for additional data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Blinded researcher coin flip, hospital level
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation at hospital level
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome data for all patients
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All relevant outcomes reported.
Other bias Low risk  
Baseline Outcomes similar? Low risk Table 3, also pair‐matched clusters for important variables
Free of contamination? Low risk Allocation at hospital level
Baseline characteristics similar? Low risk No clinically relevant differences