Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 4;2017(2):CD010331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010331.pub2

Kaur 2003.

Methods Single‐centre randomised controlled trial performed in India.
Participants 60 newborn infants ≥ 34 weeks' gestation, postnatal age < 4 weeks and undergoing diagnostic lumbar puncture.
Uncomplicated vaginal or caesarean section delivery, 5‐minute Apgar score ≥ 7, no history of maternal medication use, absence of structural neurodevelopmental anomalies and a rectal temperature of 37 ± 0.5 °C. Lumbar puncture was performed to rule out meningitis in ill newborns with seizures or sepsis, according to intensive care treatment protocol.
Exclusion criteria: infants receiving sedatives or analgesics.
Interventions Intervention: EMLA 1.0 g cream.
Placebo: 1.0 g cream.
Both creams were applied to 1 cm2 of skin under an occlusive dressing for 60 to 90 minutes, then wiped off and the lumbar puncture procedure performed immediately.
Outcomes Pain using NFCS score: 4 items of facial action (brow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow and open mouth) and the presence of crying used as measures of behavioural response to pain. Each response given a score of 1 if present and 0 if absent, for a possible total ranging from 0 to 5.
Heart rate.
Oxygen saturation.
Methaemoglobinaemia (clinical symptoms).
Adverse effects.
Notes Power calculation performed: 21 infants per group were needed. Kaur (2003) used 1 total NFCS score of 0 to 5, where presence of a behaviour score = 1 point and absence = 0 points for each of the 5 variables.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated simple random number table.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Neonates received either EMLA or the placebo cream "in a double‐blind manner".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Placebo cream consisted of an inert oil that resembled EMLA. EMLA and placebo were supplied in identical tubes marked only with a number.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes for all infants reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not obtained.
Other bias Low risk