Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 13;2017(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2

Comparison 3. Intensive Pinard versus routine Pinard.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes after birth 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.35, 2.31]
2 Caesarean section for fetal distress 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.35, 1.38]
3 Perintal mortality 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.19, 1.67]
4 Fetal heart rate abnormality detected 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.71 [1.10, 2.65]
5 Early and late fetal heart rate decelerations detected 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.79, 2.23]
6 Admission to NICU/NNU 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.59, 1.19]
7 Seizures in the neonatal period 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.24, 1.88]
8 Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.27, 1.84]
9 Caesarean section 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.46, 1.08]
10 Instrumental vaginal birth 1 625 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.21 [0.69, 2.11]
11 Length of labour (hours) 1 625 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.5 [‐0.52, 1.52]