Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;2017(3):CD012332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012332.pub2

Kravitz 1994.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group
Probably single centre in USA
Diagnostic criteria of Yunus 1981
1 week screening and washout, 1 week parallel‐group phase
Single missing data point imputation, but all were completers
Placebo ibuprofen for 1 week before baseline visit
No minimum pain intensity
Participants Ibuprofen: N = 15
Placebo: N = 16
No important demographic differences noted. Overall mean age 48 years (SD 11), 92% women, 90% White
Inclusion criteria: modified Yunus 1981
Exclusion criteria: pregnant or child‐bearing potential, nursing, allergy or sensitivity to study drugs, peptic ulcer or bleeding, alcohol or drug abuse, major depression, suicidal ideation, psychosis or schizophrenia, fibromyalgia of secondary cause. Previous psychiatric illness not an exclusion if participant not currently ill
Interventions Ibuprofen 600 mg four times a day
Placebo
Outcomes Pain: 0‐100 mm
PGIC much or very much improved: 7‐point scale
Fatigue: not assessed
Sleep problems: not assessed
Adverse events (AEs): no information provided
Health‐related quality of life: not assessed
Psychological distress: HRDS, BDI, HARS
Notes Oxford Quality Score
R = 1
DB = 1
W = 1
Total = 3/5
No conflicts of interest reported
Funding source ‐ Arthritis Foundation, and Syntex
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No details reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details reported. Not mentioned that placebo identical
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participant‐reported for major outcome. Not mentioned if other measures evaluated in a blinded manner by one assessor
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All important outcomes reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All important outcomes reported
Group similarity at baseline Low risk No important demographic differences between groups
Sample size bias High risk Fewer than 50 participants per treatment arm