Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 21;2017(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3
Methods Type of study: RCT Method of treatment allocation: method of randomisation not stated. Stratification: none stated Placebo: no Sample size calculation: no Intention‐to‐treat analyses: yes Losses to follow‐up: no Funding: FIS; Perinatal Section of SEGO
Participants Location: Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain Timeframe: 1987‐1990 Eligibility criteria: women with PROM Gestational age range: 28‐30 weeks Exclusion criteria: none stated Total recruited: 18 women and infants; 12 women and infants in the treatment arm and 6 women and infants in the control arm
Interventions Type and dose of corticosteroid used in the treatment group is not stated Control group received expectant management
Outcomes Fetal/neonatal outcome reported (RDS)
Notes Study only available as an abstract. Further information was requested from the study authors but there was no reply
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of randomisation not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Blinding of participants and personnel not stated, although unlikely as placebo was not used
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding of outcome assessment was not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Study only available as an abstract
Other bias Unclear risk Study was only available as an abstract. Further information was requested from the study authors, but there was no reply