Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 10;2017(3):CD000376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000376.pub4

Makrides 1999.

Methods Single‐centre RCT conducted in Adelaide
Participants N = 83. Inclusion criteria: healthy term infants. Exclusion criteria: small for gestational age, congenital disease, infants of insulin‐dependent diabetic mothers, history of drug or alcohol abuse in the mother
 LCPUFA (DHA and AA) supplemented formula: N = 28 (GA 39.8 ± 1.3 weeks; BW 3549 ± 521 grams)
 LCPUFA (DHA alone) supplemented formula: N = 27 (GA 39.6 ± 1.1 weeks, BW 3378 ± 431 grams)
 Control formula: N = 28 (GA 39.6 ± 1.5 weeks, BW 3549 ± 497 grams)
Interventions 'LCPUFA' group was given milk formula enriched with DHA (0.34%) and AA (0.34%). Another LCPUFA group received milk formula enriched with DHA alone (0.34%). Control group was fed standard milk formula without DHA and AA added. Infants were randomly assigned to study formula within 7 days of life. Assigned milk formula was sole source of nutrition for 4 months. Subsequently, study formula was the only source of milk until 1 year of age. Source of LCPUFA was egg yolk phospholipids (DHA + AA group) and tuna oil (DHA group)
Outcomes Plasma and RBC fatty acid levels at 6, 16 and 34 weeks and 1 year of age. Physical growth at 6, 16 and 34 weeks and at 1 and 2 years of age. VEP at 16 and 34 weeks. Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 1 and 2 years
Notes Breast‐fed reference group, n = 63
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Adequate; use of sealed opaque envelopes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Investigators and families were blinded to randomisation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 60% to 85% for various outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk Appears to be free of other biases