Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;2017(2):CD001100. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001100.pub4

Comparison 6. LMWH versus subcutaneous UFH in patients with venous thromboembolism.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism at the end of follow‐up 3 1403 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.56, 1.95]
2 Incidence of major haemorrhagic episodes (during initial treatment) 4 1471 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.50, 1.67]
3 Overall mortality at the end of follow‐up 3 1403 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.46 [0.91, 2.35]