Mereles 2006.
Methods |
Study design: RCT Study grouping: Parallel group |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Exercise
Control
Included criteria: people with severe chronic PH who were stable and compensated under optimised medical therapy (such as endothelin antagonists, iloprost, sildenafil, calcium channel blockers, anti‐coagulants, diuretics, and supplemental oxygen) for at least 3 months before entering the study were invited to participate. Additional inclusion criteria were age 18‐75 years, WHO functional class II to IV. Excluded criteria: no recent syncope, and no skeletal or muscle abnormalities prohibiting participation in an exercise programme Pretreatment: Nil evident |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Exercise
Control
|
|
Outcomes | 6MWD VO2peak Wpeak Morbidity ‐ adverse events Disease progression Precluded from training Anaerobic threshold HRQoL (SF‐36): Physical functioning HRQoL (SF‐36): Role physical HRQoL (SF36): Bodily pain HRQoL (SF‐36): General health HRQoL (SF‐36): Vitality HRQoL (SF‐36): Social function HRQoL (SF‐36): Role emotional HRQoL (SF‐36): Mental health HRQoL:Physical Summary score (SF36) HRQoL:Mental Summary score (SF36) HRQol (CAMPHOR): QoL NYHA Class Discontinued training |
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: this study was funded by a grant from the German Pulmonary Hypertension Group, Pulmonale Hypertonie e.V., Rheinstetten, Germany. Country: Germany Setting: inpatient rehabilitation Comments: Author's name: Derliz Mereles Institution: University Hospital Heidelberg Email: ekkehard_gruenig@med.uni‐heidelberg.de Address: Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, D‐69120 Heidelberg |
|
Notes | Adverse Outcomes Authors report that all participants tolerated training and had no adverse events during training and no progression of the disease as defined by progression of symptoms, PH or right heart failure. Two participants perceived a short episode of dizziness without fainting immediately after bicycle ergometer training. In 1 participant, oxygen saturation dropped from 88% to 74% during exercise, although the training was performed with an oxygen mask. Continuous Outcomes 6MWD is reported as a change from baseline at the post‐inpatient and post‐outpatient time points | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Comment: participants were randomly assigned to either a primary training group or a sedentary control group using a permuted block randomization procedure |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: there is no comment regarding allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: unable to blind participants and personnel due to nature of intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The completed questionnaire at baseline was compared with the results after 15 weeks by investigators who were blinded to the patients’ clinical data and group assignment. To avoid bias as far as possible in this study, all measurements and/or offline readings were performed by investigators who were blinded to patient data and group assignment." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No dropouts reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The protocol was not registered or published however the outcome reporting is comprehensive. |
Other bias | High risk | Comment: No CONSORT diagram so not possible to tell how many people were assessed in order to recruit the sample. |