Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;2017(1):CD011285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011285.pub2

Mereles 2006.

Methods Study design: RCT
Study grouping: Parallel group
Participants Baseline characteristics
Exercise
  • Number enrolled: 15

  • Gender (male/female): 5/10

  • Age (years): 47 (12)

  • Type of PH: PAH n = 13, CTEPH n = 2

  • Haemodynamics: PASP (mmHG, Echo): 61 (18)

  • Haemodynamics: CI (L/min/m2, Echo):

  • Haemodynamics: mPAP (mmHG, RHC): 49.5 (17.6)

  • Haemodynamics: PVR (Dyne.s/cm5, RHC): 968.7 (444.1)

  • Height (cm): 171 (11)

  • Weight (kg): 75 (13)

  • Medications (single/double/triple): 6/5/4

  • NYHA, WHO Functional Class (I/II/III/IV): 0/2/12/1


Control
  • Number enrolled: 15

  • Gender (male/female): 5/10

  • Age (years) 53 (14)

  • Type of PH: PAH n = 11, CTEPH n = 4

  • Haemodynamics: PASP (mmHG, Echo): 61 (18)

  • Haemodynamics: CI (L/min/m2, Echo):

  • Haemodynamics: mPAP (mmHG, RHC): 49.6 (12.3)

  • Haemodynamics: PVR (Dyne.s/cm5, RHC): 901.8 (358.0)

  • Height (cm): 166 (5)

  • Weight (kg): 78 (18)

  • Medications (single/double/triple): 7/5/3

  • NYHA, WHO Functional Class (I/II/III/IV): 0/4/10/1


Included criteria: people with severe chronic PH who were stable and compensated under optimised medical therapy (such as endothelin antagonists, iloprost, sildenafil, calcium channel blockers, anti‐coagulants, diuretics, and supplemental oxygen) for at least 3 months before entering the study were invited to participate. Additional inclusion criteria were age 18‐75 years, WHO functional class II to IV.
Excluded criteria: no recent syncope, and no skeletal or muscle abnormalities prohibiting participation in an exercise programme
Pretreatment: Nil evident
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Exercise
  • Setting: 3 weeks inpatient followed by 12 weeks outpatient, unsupervised training

  • Components: exercise training (see below), mental training to improve perception of physical abilities and limits to keep physical exercise safe even in demanding situations, dumbbell training of single muscle groups with low weights (500‐1000 g) and 30 min of respiratory training, including stretching, breathing techniques such as pursed lip breathing, body perception, yoga, and strengthening of respiratory muscles

  • Training dose: frequency: inpatient: walking and cycling 7 d/week, resistance ex and respiratory training 5 d/week. Outpatient: cycling 5 x/week, walk twice a week, respiratory training and resistance ex second daily

  • Intervention (mode): interval bicycle ergometer training, walking, respiratory training, resistance training

  • Training dose: duration: 10‐25 min cycle ergometer, 60 min walking, 30 min resistance training, 30 min respiratory training

  • Training dose: intensity: cycle ergometer; 60%‐80% of HR on CPET. HR maintained < 120 bpm, oxygen saturation > 85%


Control
  • Intervention (mode): "Patients in the control group received a common rehabilitation program based on healthy nutrition, physical therapy such as massages, inhalation, counselling, and muscular relaxation without exercise and respiratory training but were allowed to perform daily activity as usual. All patients were advised to avoid heavy exercise"

  • Training dose: duration: 0 (I) 0 (O)

  • Training dose: intensity: 0 (I) 0 (O)

  • 10 of 15 participants entered the exercise training arm at the end of the study

Outcomes 6MWD
VO2peak
Wpeak
Morbidity ‐ adverse events
Disease progression
Precluded from training
Anaerobic threshold
HRQoL (SF‐36): Physical functioning
HRQoL (SF‐36): Role physical
HRQoL (SF36): Bodily pain
HRQoL (SF‐36): General health
HRQoL (SF‐36): Vitality
HRQoL (SF‐36): Social function
HRQoL (SF‐36): Role emotional
HRQoL (SF‐36): Mental health
HRQoL:Physical Summary score (SF36)
HRQoL:Mental Summary score (SF36)
HRQol (CAMPHOR): QoL
NYHA Class
Discontinued training
Identification Sponsorship source: this study was funded by a grant from the German Pulmonary Hypertension Group, Pulmonale Hypertonie e.V., Rheinstetten, Germany.
Country: Germany
Setting: inpatient rehabilitation
Comments:
Author's name: Derliz Mereles
Institution: University Hospital Heidelberg
Email: ekkehard_gruenig@med.uni‐heidelberg.de
Address: Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, D‐69120 Heidelberg
Notes Adverse Outcomes 
 Authors report that all participants tolerated training and had no adverse events during training and no progression of the disease as defined by progression of symptoms, PH or right heart failure. Two participants perceived a short episode of dizziness without fainting immediately after bicycle ergometer training. In 1 participant, oxygen saturation dropped from 88% to 74% during exercise, although the training was performed with an oxygen mask.
 Continuous Outcomes 
 6MWD is reported as a change from baseline at the post‐inpatient and post‐outpatient time points
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: participants were randomly assigned to either a primary training group or a sedentary control group using a permuted block randomization procedure
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: there is no comment regarding allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: unable to blind participants and personnel due to nature of intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The completed questionnaire at baseline was compared with the results after 15 weeks by investigators who were blinded to the patients’ clinical data and group assignment. To avoid bias as far as possible in this study, all measurements and/or offline readings were performed by investigators who were blinded to patient data and group assignment."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No dropouts reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The protocol was not registered or published however the outcome reporting is comprehensive.
Other bias High risk Comment: No CONSORT diagram so not possible to tell how many people were assessed in order to recruit the sample.