Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;2017(3):CD011640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011640.pub2

Alam 2016.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: Bangladesh.
 Number randomised: 50.
 Post‐randomisation drop‐outs: 20 (40%).
 Revised sample size: 30.
 Average age: 42 years.
 Females: 23 (76,7%).
 NASH: 30 (100%).
 Diabetics: 8 (26,7%).
 Average follow‐up period in months: 12.
 Inclusion criteria
 1. Patients aged 18 to 65 years in whom NAFLD activity score ≥ 5 in liver histology.
 Exclusion criteria
 1. Alcohol intake > 20 g/day.
 2. Presence of comorbid conditions such as chronic hepatitis of other causes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive cardiac failure, history of recent myocardial infarction, hypothyroidism.
 3. Decompensated cirrhosis of liver.
 4. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > five times upper normal limit.
 5. History of taking angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to two groups.
 Group 1: telmisartan (N = 20).
 Further details: telmisartan 40 mg OD.
 Group 2: control (N = 10).
 Further details: control: no intervention.
 Duration of treatment: 12 months. All people also underwent lifestyle modification.
Outcomes Outcomes reported: 1. Mortality 2. Adverse events 3. Decompensated liver disease 4. Liver transplantation 5. Cirrhosis 6. Change in fibrosis score 7. Change in NAS score 8. Resolution of fatty liver disease.
Notes Authors provided additional information in September 2016
 Reasons for post‐randomisation drop‐outs: lack of interest in undergoing liver biopsy.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Random sequence was generated by lottery. Each subject was requested to pick up one among folded papers on which their destined group name was inscribed".
 Comment: author replies.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Random sequence was generated by lottery. Each subject was requested to pick up one among folded papers on which their destined group name was inscribed".
 Comment: author replies.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "This was an open‐label RCT".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "This was an open‐label RCT".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: there were post‐randomisation drop‐outs, which may be related to the treatment that the participants received.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: mortality and adverse events were reported.
For‐profit bias Low risk Quote: "Alam S, Kabir J, Mustafa G, Gupa UD, Hasan SKMN and Alam KAK declare that there is no financial relation with any person or organization for this study".
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other risk of bias.