Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;2017(3):CD011640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011640.pub2

Garinis 2010.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: Italy.
 Number randomised: 50.
 Post‐randomisation drop‐outs: 5 (10%).
 Revised sample size: 45.
 Average age: 44 years.
 Females: 38 (84.4%).
 NASH: not stated.
 Diabetics: not stated.
 Average follow‐up period in months: 6.
 Inclusion criteria
 1. Ultrasound proven NAFLD.
 2. BMI more than 25 kg/m².
 Exclusion criteria
 1. Heart disease.
 2. Renal failure.
 3. Smoking habits.
 4. Alcohol intake > 20 g/day.
 5. Viral, autoimmune, metabolic or genetic liver diseases.
 6. Drugs known for inducing liver steatosis.
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to two groups.
 Group 1: metformin (N = 20).
 Further details: metformin 1 g per day.
 Group 2: control (N = 25).
 Further details: control: no intervention.
 Duration of treatment: 6 months. Both groups received hypocaloric diet.
Outcomes Outcomes reported: Resolution of fatty liver.
Notes Reasons for post‐randomisation drop‐outs: non‐compliance to treatment.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Patients were randomized into two groups".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "All patients underwent US liver evaluation by a single experienced operator (M.D.S.), blinded to the clinical data".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: there were post‐randomisation drop‐outs, which may be related to the treatment that the participants received.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: protocol was not available; neither mortality nor adverse events were reported.
For‐profit bias Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other risk of bias.