Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;2017(3):CD011640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011640.pub2

Neuschwander‐Tetri 2015.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: USA.
 Number randomised: 283.
 Post‐randomisation drop‐outs: not stated.
 Revised sample size: 283.
 Average age: 51 years.
 Females: 187 (66.1%).
 NASH: 283 (100%).
 Diabetics: 149 (52.7%).
 Average follow‐up period in months: 17.
 Inclusion criteria
 1. Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of screening.
 2. Histological evidence of definite or borderline non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis based upon a liver biopsy obtained 90 days or less before randomisation.
 3. NAS score ≥ 4 with a score ≥ 1 in each component of the score.
 Exclusion criteria
 1. Presence of cirrhosis.
 2. Other causes of liver disease.
 3. Substantial alcohol consumption (> 20 g/day for women or > 30 g/day for men).
 4. Other confounding conditions.
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to two groups.
 Group 1: obeticholic acid (N = 141).
 Further details: obeticholic acid 25 mg OD.
 Group 2: control (N = 142).
 Further details: control: placebo.
 Duration of treatment: 17 months.
Outcomes Outcomes reported: 1. Mortality 2. Adverse events 3. Change in fibrosis score 4. Change in NAS score. 5. Resolution of fatty liver disease.
Notes Reasons for post‐randomisation drop‐outs: not stated.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "computer‐generated, centrally administered procedure".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "computer‐generated, centrally administered procedure.Treatment was assigned centrally using a web‐based application".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Patients, investigators, clinical site staff, and pathologists were masked to treatment assignment".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Patients, investigators, clinical site staff, and pathologists were masked to treatment assignment".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: all participants were included for safety issues and non‐histological outcomes but 64 participants were excluded for histological outcomes.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: mortality and adverse events were reported.
For‐profit bias High risk Quote: "National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Intercept Pharmaceuticals".
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other risk of bias.