Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;2017(3):CD011640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011640.pub2

Razavizade 2013.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: Iran.
 Number randomised: 80.
 Post‐randomisation drop‐outs: 0 (0%).
 Revised sample size: 80.
 Average age: 35 years.
 Females: 12 (15%).
 NASH: not stated.
 Diabetics: 6 (7.5%).
 Average follow‐up period in months: 4.
 Inclusion criteria
 1. Aged ≥ 18 years.
 2. Ultrasound proven NAFLD.
 3. Persistently elevated transaminases (≥ 40 UI/L).
 4. NAFLD liver fat score > ‐0.64.
 Exclusion criteria
 1. Alcohol consumption > 20 g/day for men and 10 g/day for women.
 2. Type 1 diabetes.
 3. Heart disease.
 4. Liver diseases (viral hepatitis, auto‐immune hepatitis, Wilson disease, haemochromatosis, liver mass lesion).
 5. Renal disease (creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL).
 6. Severe systemic comorbidities.
 7. Neoplasm.
 8. Any medication in the previous 3 months.
 9. Previous treatment with thiazolinediones, biguanides or insulin.
 10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to two groups.
 Group 1: metformin (N = 40).
 Further details: metformin 1 g per day.
 Group 2: pioglitazone (N = 40).
 Further details: pioglitazone 30 mg/day.
 Duration of treatment: 4 months. Both groups received hypocaloric diet
Outcomes Outcomes reported: 1. Mortality. 2. Adverse events. 3. Cirrhosis. 4. Decompensated liver disease. 5. Liver transplantation.
Notes Authors provided additional information in February 2016.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "predefined computer‐generated block randomization table".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "An investigator who was not involved in data collection and treatment, performed the enrolment patients and their assignments into treatment groups".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "randomized double blind clinical trial".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "randomized double blind clinical trial".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: there were no post‐randomisation drop‐outs.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: mortality and adverse events were reported.
For‐profit bias Low risk Quote: "This study was supported by the research funds of Kashan University of Medical Sciences (No: 29‐5‐1‐2851)".
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other risk of bias.