Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;2015(10):CD010081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010081.pub2

Comparison 8. Intense pulsed light versus no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment 1 34 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 9.67 [2.01, 46.43]
1.1 Axilla 1 24 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 21.0 [1.37, 322.28]
1.2 Groin 1 8 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.0 [0.31, 79.94]
1.3 Inframammary 1 2 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.24, 37.67]