Almasio 2000.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: Italy. Number randomised: 90. Post‐randomisation dropouts: 6 (6.7%). Revised sample size: 84. Mean age: 54 years. Females: 81 (96.4%). Symptomatic participants: 84 (100%). AMA positive: not stated. Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): not stated. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (low) + colchicine (n = 42). Further details: UDCA: 250 mg BD for 3 years + colchicine: 1 mg/day for 3 years. Group 2: UDCA (low) (n = 42). Further details: UDCA: 250 mg BD for 3 years. |
|
Outcomes | Mortality, decompensated liver disease. | |
Notes | Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: adverse effects and low compliance. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Colchicine, 1 mg daily, or an indistinguishable placebo were randomly assigned to patients according to a computer‐generated list developed separately for each centre". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomization was performed by a central study unit…". |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: identical placebo used and authors stated double‐blind. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: identical placebo used and authors stated double‐blind. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: there were post‐randomisation dropouts. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: adverse events not reported. |
For‐profit bias | Low risk | Comment: no money received for the trial; the drug was provided by Abc Farmaceutici S.p.a (author's reply). |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other bias noted. |