Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;2017(3):CD011648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011648.pub2

Almasio 2000.

Methods Randomised clinical trial.
Participants Country: Italy.
Number randomised: 90.
Post‐randomisation dropouts: 6 (6.7%).
Revised sample size: 84.
Mean age: 54 years.
Females: 81 (96.4%).
Symptomatic participants: 84 (100%).
AMA positive: not stated.
Responders: not stated.
Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): not stated.
Inclusion criteria
  • Symptom status: symptomatic participants only.

  • AMA status: not stated.

  • Response status: not stated.


Exclusion criteria
  • People with biliary obstruction.

  • Anticipated requirement for liver transplantation in 1 year.

  • Pregnancy.

  • Aged < 18 years or > 70 years.

  • Coexisting liver disease.

  • Anticipated life expectancy < 3 years.

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups.
Group 1: UDCA (low) + colchicine (n = 42).
Further details: UDCA: 250 mg BD for 3 years + colchicine: 1 mg/day for 3 years.
Group 2: UDCA (low) (n = 42).
Further details: UDCA: 250 mg BD for 3 years.
Outcomes Mortality, decompensated liver disease.
Notes Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: adverse effects and low compliance.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Colchicine, 1 mg daily, or an indistinguishable placebo were randomly assigned to patients according to a computer‐generated list developed separately for each centre".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was performed by a central study unit…".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: identical placebo used and authors stated double‐blind.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: identical placebo used and authors stated double‐blind.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: there were post‐randomisation dropouts.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: adverse events not reported.
For‐profit bias Low risk Comment: no money received for the trial; the drug was provided by Abc Farmaceutici S.p.a (author's reply).
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other bias noted.