Bowlus 2014.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: multicentric; international. Number randomised: 216. Post‐randomisation dropouts: not stated. Revised sample size: 216. Mean age: 56 years. Females: 197 (91.2%). Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 12 months. Inclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups. Group 1: obeticholic acid (low) (n = 73). Further details: obeticholic acid (low): 5 mg orally for 12 months; frequency not stated. Group 2: obeticholic acid (low) (n = 73). Further details: obeticholic acid (low): 10 mg orally for 12 months; frequency not stated. Group 3: placebo (n = 70). |
|
Outcomes | None of the outcomes of interest reported. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: although placebo was used in double‐blind trial, unclear whether the placebo was identical. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: although placebo was used in double‐blind trial, unclear whether the placebo was identical. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: neither mortality nor adverse events reported. |
For‐profit bias | High risk | Comment: Several authors had advised pharmaceutical companies or were employees of pharmaceutical company. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other source of bias. |