Cash 2013.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: UK. Number randomised: 21. Post‐randomisation dropouts: 8 (38.1%). Revised sample size: 13. Mean age: 55 years. Females: not stated. Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: 13 (100%). Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 12 months. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: simvastatin (n = 7). Further details: simvastatin: 20 mg/day orally for 12 months. Group 2: placebo (n = 6). |
|
Outcomes | None of the outcomes of interest reported. | |
Notes | Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: adverse effects. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Patient treatment randomization and allocation was performed independently by the Department of Research Pharmacology in the Royal Victoria Hospital at the initial baseline visit". |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "The patients were blinded but the healthcare providers were not" (author's reply). |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "Outcome assessors were not blinded" (author's reply). |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: there were post‐randomisation dropouts. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: neither mortality nor adverse events reported. |
For‐profit bias | Low risk | Quote: "Financial support: The Royal Victoria Hospital Liver Support Group". |
Other bias | High risk | Quote: "Patients were allowed to continue previous prescriptions for primary biliary cholangitis. It was not clear whether this was balanced across groups". |