Heathcote 1994.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: Canada. Number randomised: 222. Post‐randomisation dropouts: not stated. Revised sample size: 222. Mean age: 56 years. Females: 206 (92.8%). Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 24 months. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (moderate) (n = 111). Further details: UDCA: 14 mg/kg/day for 2 years. Group 2: placebo (n = 111). |
|
Outcomes | Mortality, liver transplantation. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomization was done separately at each centre by the study pharmacist using consecutive identification numbers, and patients were stratified according to whether they were symptomatic or asymptomatic". |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Once informed consent was obtained from the patients, double‐blind randomization to UDCA or an identical placebo (1 : 1) was conducted". |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Once informed consent was obtained from the patients, double‐blind randomization to UDCA or an identical placebo (1 : 1) was conducted". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: unclear whether the authors have reported the outcomes on all randomised participants. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: adverse events not reported. |
For‐profit bias | High risk | Quote: "Study medications kindly provided by Interfalk Canada and Jouveinal Inc., Quebec, Canada". |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other source of bias. |