Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;2017(3):CD011648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011648.pub2

Heathcote 1994.

Methods Randomised clinical trial.
Participants Country: Canada.
Number randomised: 222.
Post‐randomisation dropouts: not stated.
Revised sample size: 222.
Mean age: 56 years.
Females: 206 (92.8%).
Symptomatic participants: not stated.
AMA positive: not stated.
Responders: not stated.
Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 24 months.
Inclusion criteria
  • Symptom status: symptomatic and asymptomatic participants.

  • AMA status: not stated.

  • Response status: not stated.


Exclusion criteria
  • Aged < 18 years.

  • On transplant list.

  • Needed to take enzyme‐inducing drugs.

  • Pregnant.

  • Other medical illnesses with anticipated life expectancy < 5 years.

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups.
Group 1: UDCA (moderate) (n = 111).
Further details: UDCA: 14 mg/kg/day for 2 years.
Group 2: placebo (n = 111).
Outcomes Mortality, liver transplantation.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was done separately at each centre by the study pharmacist using consecutive identification numbers, and patients were stratified according to whether they were symptomatic or asymptomatic".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Once informed consent was obtained from the patients, double‐blind randomization to UDCA or an identical placebo (1 : 1) was conducted".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Once informed consent was obtained from the patients, double‐blind randomization to UDCA or an identical placebo (1 : 1) was conducted".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: unclear whether the authors have reported the outcomes on all randomised participants.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: adverse events not reported.
For‐profit bias High risk Quote: "Study medications kindly provided by Interfalk Canada and Jouveinal Inc., Quebec, Canada".
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other source of bias.