Iwasaki 2008b.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: Japan. Number randomised: 22. Post‐randomisation dropouts: not stated. Revised sample size: 22. Mean age: 54 years. Females: 19 (86.4%). Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: 0 (0%). Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 12 months. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (low) + bezafibrate (n = 10). Further details: UDCA: 600 mg/day for 52 weeks + bezafibrate: 400 mg/day for 52 weeks. Group 2: UDCA (low) (n = 12). Further details: UDCA: 600 mg/day for 52 weeks. |
|
Outcomes | None of the outcomes of interest reported. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Consecutive patients from these hospitals were randomized centrally at the Kanagawa Dental University and were enrolled into the study if they met the following criteria". |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "A randomized, open study design was used because there was no suitable placebo for bezafibrate available". |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "A randomized, open study design was used because there was no suitable placebo for bezafibrate available". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: neither mortality nor adverse events reported. |
For‐profit bias | Low risk | Quote: "The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan supported this study from 2002 to 2004 with a Health Science Research Grant on a Specific Disease (Study of Intractable Liver Diseases) to chief scientist Gotaro Toda". |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other bias. |