Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;2017(3):CD011648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011648.pub2

Poupon 1991a.

Methods Randomised clinical trial.
Participants Country: France.
Number randomised: 149.
Post‐randomisation dropouts: 3 (2%).
Revised sample size: 146.
Mean age: 56 years.
Females: 134 (91.8%).
Symptomatic participants: not stated.
AMA positive: not stated.
Responders: not stated.
Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): not stated.
Inclusion criteria
  • Symptom status: not stated.

  • AMA status: not stated.

  • Response status: not stated.


Exclusion criteria
  • Received any of the following drugs during the previous 6 months: ursodiol, azathioprine, chlorambucil, colchicine, corticosteroids, D‐penicillamine, and ciclosporin.

  • Serum bilirubin concentration > 150 μmol/L.

  • Serum albumin concentration < 25 g/L.

  • Past or active gastrointestinal bleeding from oesophageal varices.

  • Evidence of past or present extrahepatic obstruction of the bile ducts.

  • Excessive alcohol consumption (> 50 g/day).

  • Positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen.

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups.
Group 1: UDCA (moderate) (n = 73).
Further details: UDCA: 13 mg/kg/day to 15 mg/kg/day for 2 years.
Group 2: placebo (n = 73).
Outcomes None of the outcomes of interest reported.
Notes Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: bilirubin > 300 μmol/L, ascites, other coexisting disease.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: identical placebo used in this double‐blind trial.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: identical placebo used in this double‐blind trial.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: there were post‐randomisation dropouts.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: neither mortality nor adverse events reported.
For‐profit bias High risk Quote: "This work was supported in part by Synthélabo‐Recherche and in Canada by Jouveinal and Interfalk".
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other source of bias.