Poupon 1996.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: France. Number randomised: 74. Post‐randomisation dropouts: not stated. Revised sample size: 74. Mean age: 54 years. Females: 63 (85.1%). Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 24 months. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (moderate) + colchicine (n = 37). Further details: UDCA: 13 mg/kg/day to 15 mg/kg/day for 2 years + colchicine: 1 mg/day for 5 days in a week for 2 years. Group 2: UDCA (moderate) (n = 37). Further details: UDCA: 13 mg/kg/day to 15 mg/kg/day for 2 years. |
|
Outcomes | Mortality, adverse events. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: identical placebo used in this double‐blind trial. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: identical placebo used in this double‐blind trial. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: unclear whether all randomised participants were included for analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: mortality and morbidity reported. |
For‐profit bias | High risk | Quote: "Supported in part by Laboratoires Houde (France) and Jouveinal (Canada)". |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other source of bias. |