Raedsch 1993.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: Germany. Number randomised: 28. Post‐randomisation dropouts: 8 (28.6%). Revised sample size: 20. Mean age: 54 years. Females: 20 (100%). Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 24 months. Inclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (moderate) + colchicine (n = 8). Further details: UDCA: 10 mg/kg/day to 12 mg/kg/day for 24 months + colchicine: 1 mg/day for 24 months. Group 2: UDCA (moderate) (n = 12). Further details: UDCA: 10 mg/kg/day to 12 mg/kg/day for 24 months. |
|
Outcomes | Adverse events. | |
Notes | Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: adverse events, lost to follow‐up. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: although a placebo used in this double‐blind trial, unclear whether the placebo was identical. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: although a placebo used in this double‐blind trial, unclear whether the placebo was identical. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: there were post‐randomisation dropouts. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: mortality not reported. |
For‐profit bias | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other source of bias. |