Senior 1991.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: USA. Number randomised: 20. Post‐randomisation dropouts: 1 (5%). Revised sample size: 19. Mean age: not stated. Females: not stated. Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: not stated. Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): all participants followed up for 18 months. Inclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (low) (n = 9). Further details: UDCA (low): 8 mg/kg/day to 12 mg/kg/day for 6 months. Group 2: placebo (n = 10). |
|
Outcomes | None of the outcomes of interest reported. | |
Notes | Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: had coexisting gallstones. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: although a placebo used in this double‐blind trial, unclear whether the placebo was identical. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: although a placebo used in this double‐blind trial, unclear whether the placebo was identical. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: there were post‐randomisation dropouts. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: neither mortality nor adverse events reported. |
For‐profit bias | High risk | Quote: "and ursodiol supplies provided by Ciba‐Geigy Corporation". |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other source of bias. |