Van Hoogstraten 1998.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: Netherlands. Number randomised: 61. Post‐randomisation dropouts: 2 (3.3%). Revised sample size: 59. Mean age: 57 years. Females: 55 (93.2%). Symptomatic participants: not stated. AMA positive: not stated. Responders: 0 (0%). Mean follow‐up period (for all groups): not stated. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: UDCA (low) (n = 32). Further details: UDCA (low): 10 mg/kg/day for 6 months. Group 2: UDCA (moderate) (n = 27). Further details: UDCA (moderate): 20 mg/kg/day for 6 months. |
|
Outcomes | Adverse events. | |
Notes | Reasons for post‐randomisation dropouts: developed liver failure, lost to follow‐up. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Tables with random numbers" (author's reply). |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Opaque closed envelopes" (author's reply). |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "randomised open controlled trial". |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "randomised open controlled trial". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: mortality not reported. |
For‐profit bias | High risk | Quote: "This study was supported in part by Zambon Nederland BV, Amersfoort, the Netherlands". |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other source of bias. |