Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 26;2016(8):CD004131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004131.pub3

Comparison 1. Acupuncture plus baseline treatment versus sham acupuncture plus baseline treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Improvement of motor function 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Improvement of cognitive function 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Orientation 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Perception 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Praxis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 Visuomotor organisation 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.5 Thinking operation 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.6 Memory 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.7 Attention 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Improvement of Health‐Related Quality of Life (MOS SF‐36) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 Physical component summary 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Mental component summary 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Improvement of Stroke‐Specific Quality of Life(SS QOL) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Language 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.2 Personality 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]