Zhang 2013a.
Methods | RCT
Method of randomisation: closed envelopes
Blinding: Investigators, participants, not blinded
Adverse effects: not stated ITT analysis: none Losses to FU: not stated |
|
Participants | Country: China Number of participants included: 90 (30/30/30) Demographics: 43‐75 years, 54% male Type of stroke: both ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes Diagnosis: WHO definition and all confirmed by CT/MRI Severity on entry: not stated Time from stroke onset: 6‐19 months Setting: inpatient Comparability: no significant difference in age or time post onset | |
Interventions | 3 arms:
Comparison eligible: acupuncture + WM versus WM Acupuncture treatment
Control interventions: WM |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | ‐ | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation by using closed envelopes |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation by using closed envelopes |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "unable to blind to participants and operators" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "unable to blind to participants and operators" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not given |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Information on attrition was not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Some patient‐related outcomes were not reported, such as information on quality of life or all‐cause mortality |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information provided |