Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Bindman 2002 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
Borum 1999 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Brophy 2006 | Allocation: not randomised, no controls. |
Burgess 2006 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Bursten 1986 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Chaimowitz 2004 | Review: no primary data. |
Dawson 2006 | Review: no primary data. |
Fernandez 1990b | Allocation: not randomised, no controls. |
Frank 2005 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Geller 1998 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Georgieva 2013 | Not an RCT of CTOs |
Gray 2005 | Review: no primary data. |
Greeman 1985 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Hiday 1987 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Hiday 1989 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Hiday 1999 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Hunt 2007 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Jethwa 2008 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
Kanter 1995 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
Kisely 2004 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Kisely 2005 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Kisely 2006a | Review: no primary data. |
Kisely 2006b | Review: no primary data. |
Kisely 2007a | Review: no primary data. |
Kisely 2007b | Review: no primary data. |
Kisely 2013a | Allocation: not randomised. |
Kisely 2013b | Allocation: not randomised. |
Lawton‐Smith 2008 | Review: no primary data. |
Lidz 1998 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
Link 2011 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Miller 1984 | Allocation: not randomised, before and after design. |
Miller 1985 | Allocation: not randomised, survey of providers. |
Muirhead 2006 | Allocation: not randomised, retrospective design. |
Mullen 2006 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
Munetz 1996 | Allocation: not randomised, retrospective design. |
NASMHPD 2001 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
NHPF 2000 | Allocation: not randomised, review. |
O'Brien 2005 | Allocation: not randomised, no controls. |
O'Keefe 1997 | Allocation: not randomised, no controls. |
O'Reilly 2004 | Review: no primary data. |
O'Reilly 2006 | Qualitative evaluation: not randomised. |
Patel 2008 | Review: no primary data. |
Preston 2002 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Ridgely 2001 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Rohland 1998 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Romans 2004 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2006a | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2006b | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2006c | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2006d | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2006e | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2006f | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2008 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Segal 2009 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Sensky 1991 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Swartz 1997 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Swartz 2004 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Swartz 2006 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Szmukler 2001 | No primary data. |
Thornicroft 2013 | Not a study of CCT. |
Van Putten 1988 | Allocation: not randomised, no controls. |
Vaughan 2000 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Wagner 2003 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or other major psychotic or affective disorders. Intervention: 1. CCT: intensive court‐ordered compulsory outpatient commitment vs 2. standard care: control group who were released from outpatient commitment by notifying the court. Outcomes: no usable outcomes. Only the number of subsequent outpatient visits were reported, this was considered to be inherent to the process of CCT/outpatient commitment and not a result of the interventions. |
Wales 2006 | Review: no primary data. |
Xiao 2004 | Allocation: not randomised. |
Zanni 1986 | Allocation: not randomised, no controls. |
CCT: compulsory community treatment; CTO: community treatment order; RCT: randomised controlled trial.