Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Eplerenone 50 mg daily
Female (%): 30
White (%): 67
African American (%): 19
Hispanic (%): 15
Asian/other (%): 0
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 155.6
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 100.8
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 75.7
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 154.7
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 101.6
Placebo
Female (%): 4
White (%): 58
African American (%): 25
Hispanic (%): 17
Asian/other (%): 0
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 153.5
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 101.3
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 76.3
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 153.1
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 102.9
Eplerenone 100 mg daily
Female (%): 39
White (%): 67
African American (%): 24
Hispanic (%): 8
Asian/other (%): 0
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 153.0
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 100.8
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 74.5
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 153.8
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 102.1
Eplerenone 400 mg daily
Female (%): 36
White (%): 66
African American (%): 25
Hispanic (%): 5
Asian/other (%): 4
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 152.2
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 101.7
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 73.7
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 151.2
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 102.5
Eplerenone 25 mg twice daily
Female (%): 27
White (%): 75
African American (%): 15
Hispanic (%): 9
Asian/other (%): 2
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 155.7
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 101.0
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 75.0
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 154.7
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 101.9
Eplerenone 50 mg twice daily
Female (%): 30
White (%): 70
African American (%): 19
Hispanic (%): 9
Asian/other (%): 2
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 153.6
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 101.2
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 74.0
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 153.4
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 102.1
Eplerenone 200 mg twice daily
Female (%): 31
White (%): 73
African American (%): 15
Hispanic (%): 10
Asian/other (%): 2
Seated SBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 155.4
Seated DBP (mmHg, mean ±SD): 102.0
HR (beats/min, mean ±SD): 73.4
Male (%): 69
Standing SBP (mmHg, mean): 154.7
Standing DBP (mmHg, mean): 103.0
Inclusion criteria:
21‐80 years old with both seated, cuff‐assessed diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 95 mmHg and < 114 mmHg and a 24‐h mean DBP ≥ 85 mmHg determined by a 24‐h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) device
Medication compliance (80%) during the single‐blind placebo lead‐in period was required to qualify for randomization
Exclusion criteria:
Secondary, severe, or malignant hypertension with or without retinopathy
Regular use of systemic medications known to influence BP
Regular use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs
Myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, angina pectoris, or intermittent claudication within the previous 6 months
Severe aortic or mitral valvular disease and cardiac arrhythmia requiring medical treatment or causing haemodynamically relevant disturbances
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure requiring digoxin or diuretic therapy
Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the previous 6 months
Insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus
Acute or chronic hepatic disease
Serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL or serum potassium > 5.0 mEq/L
History of alcohol or drug abuse
Known hypersensitivity to spironolactone or steroids
Use of any other investigational medication 30 days before this study
Night‐shift employment
Upper arm circumference > 42 cm
Pretreatment: study notes no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Groups look well‐balanced |
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Eplerenone 50 mg daily Placebo Eplerenone 100 mg daily Eplerenone 400 mg daily Eplerenone 25 mg twice daily Eplerenone 50 mg twice daily Eplerenone 200 mg twice daily |
Outcomes |
Change from baseline in SBP (seated)
Change from baseline in DBP (seated)
Change from baseline in 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (SBP)
Outcome type: continuous outcome
Reporting: partially reported
Unit of measure: mmHg
Direction: lower is better
Data value: change from baseline
Change from baseline in 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (DBP)
Outcome type: continuous outcome
Reporting: partially reported
Unit of measure: mmHg
Direction: lower is better
Data value: change from baseline
Number of patients with any adverse events (occurring in at least 5% of patients)
Outcome type: adverse event
Reporting: fully reported
Direction: lower is better
Data value: endpoint
Number of patients discontinued medication due to AE
Outcome type: adverse event
Reporting: fully reported
Direction: lower is better
Data value: endpoint
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: Pharmacia Corporation, Skokie IL Country: 48 US sites Author's name: Myron H Weinberger Institution: Indiana University School of Medicine, Hypertension Research Center Email: mweinbe@iupui.edu Address: 541 Clinical Drive #423Indianapolis, IN46202‐5111 |
Notes |
— |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Sequence Generation |
Low risk |
Quote: "Qualified patients in the double‐blind treatment period were randomised by a computer‐generated schedule to 50, 100, or 400 mg of eplerenone administered once daily or in divided doses; 50 mg of spironolactone twice daily; or placebo." |
Allocation concealment |
Low risk |
Judgement comment: allocation of all patients simultaneously after run‐in via computer randomization. |
Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Quote: "8‐week double‐blind treatment period." Judgement comment: unclear, because exactly who was blinded is not known. No mention of matching placebo used to mimic twice daily dosing of eplerenone groups |
Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Judgement comment: no reference to blinding of assessors made. No mention of double dummy design. |
Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Quote: "Overall, 417 patients were randomised to receive at least one dose of study medication and were subsequently included in the safety analyses. Of these, 409 had at least one evaluation after their baseline evaluation and were included in the efficacy analyses. Five patients were excluded because of protocol noncompliance and three were lost to follow‐up. An additional 39 patients did not complete the study because of treatment failure (7), loss to follow‐up (2), protocol noncompliance (16), pre‐existing protocol violation (3), or adverse events (11)." Judgement comment: not clear how 11.3% patient withdrawals were distributed across groups or how missing data was dealt with. |
Selective outcome reporting |
Unclear risk |
Judgement comment: no protocol available. |
Other sources of bias |
High risk |
Quote: "This study was supported by Pharmacia Corporation, Skokie, IL." |