Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 10;2017(3):CD008524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008524.pub3

Van Agtmaal 1988.

Methods Individually randomised, non‐placebo trial conducted in Thailand
Participants Eligibility: no exclusion criteria were described
Sample: study included 30 children in which 14 were in vitamin A group and 21 in control group. Participants had a mean age of 3.1 years
Interventions Children in experimental group received a single dose vitamin A in a dose of 200,000 IU. Study participants were followed for 4 months
Outcomes Mean vitamin A serum levels
Notes Children were recruited from 3 rural day care centres
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "After selection, 14 children were randomly supplemented with a single, oral dose of vitamin A (110 mg retinyl palmitate, 200,000 IU),according to WHO recommendations (9), and 21 children served as a control group."
Comment: inadequate information provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: inadequate information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Blinding of Participants Unclear risk Comment: inadequate information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Blinding of provider Unclear risk Comment: inadequate information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Blinding of outcome assessor Unclear risk Comment: inadequate information provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) High risk Quote: "Due to the absence of some children at the different time points the number of data available for statistical analysis was less than the total number of children involved in this study . . . the number of children from whom complete data sets could be collected was rather low."
Comment: no comprehensive data given on lost to follow‐up nor reasons for loss
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: does not report data on serum retinol levels, which were collected/measured
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: inadequate information provided