Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD008391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008391.pub2

Hu 2003.

Methods RCT
Randomisation by computer program
Participants 86 inpatients with stroke
Group 1: n = 44
Group 2: n = 42
Interventions Group 1: 45‐minute session/day, 5 days/week of cognitive rehabilitation including the use of cards, use or practical objects, self programmed computer software and transition to ADL (restorative)
Group 2: medicine, occupational therapy and physiotherapy (restorative)
Outcomes Neurobehavioural Cognitive Status Examination for general cognition but with executive function subcomponents, Barthel Index
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment not documented
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Assessor was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No data for the 8 participants who dropped out
Other bias High risk If the cognitive rehabilitation sessions were in addition to standard therapies, the extra intervention may have had the positive effect rather than the content per se