Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 24;2013(9):CD009020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2

1. Comparison of MRI, US and MRA for detection of any rotator cuff tears (partial or full thickness) using all studies (indirect comparison).

Index test Studies Shoulders Cases Summary sensitivity (95% CI) Summary specificity (95% CI) LR+ LR– Test1
Any rotator cuff tears 
MRI 6 347 263 98 (92, 99) 79 (68, 87) 5 (2, 10) 0.03 (0.01, 0.11) P = 0.13
US 13 854 626 91 (83, 95) 85 (74, 92) 6 (3, 12) 0.11 (0.05, 0.22)
Full thickness tears 
MRI 7 368 193 94 (85, 98) 93 (83, 97) 13 (6, 29) 0.06 (0.02, 0.16) P = 0.7
MRA 3 183 107 94 (80, 98) 92 (83, 97) 12 (5, 30) 0.06 (0.02, 0.23)
US 10 729 386 92 (82, 96) 93 (81, 97) 12 (5, 34) 0.09 (0.04, 0.20)
Partial tears 
MRI 6 347 83 74 (59, 85) 93 (84, 97) 10 (4, 26) 0.28 (0.17, 0.48) P = 1.00
US 8 660 121 52 (33, 70) 93 (85, 97) 8 (3, 19) 0.52 (0.33, 0.80)

1 Likelihood ratio test for evidence of a difference in sensitivity and/or specificity between the tests.

LR+ = positive likelihood ratio; LR– = negative likelihood ratio