Yen 2004.
Clinical features and settings |
Inclusion criteria: Patients with shoulder pain and suspected of rotator cuff tears Exclusion criteria: Not reported Duration of symptoms: Not reported Previous treatments: Not reported Care setting: Not reported |
|
Participants |
Place of study: Taiwan, China Period of study: Not reported Number of participants eligible: 50 participants Number of participants enrolled IT and RS: ‐ US and open surgery: 50 Data available for analyses: ‐ US and open surgery: 50 Age: mean 63 years (range 17 to 81 years) Male/Female: 26/24 Dominant arm: Not reported Nature of onset: Not reported |
|
Study design |
Primary objective: To prospectively compare the US and operative findings of rotator cuff tears Study design: Prospective accuracy cohort study Unclear whether consecutive recruitment Language: English |
|
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Target conditions: Presence any rotator cuff tears Reference standard(s): Open surgery ‐ Description of technique: Not reported ‐ Criteria for a positive result: Not reported |
|
Index and comparator tests |
Index test(s): US ‐ Description of technique: Scanner: 7 MHz linear transducer Technique: Longitudinal, transverse and oblique scans of the tendons were used Patient position: Probably patient seated with the arm in External rotation for scanning the subscapularis tendon Neutral position for the long head of the biceps tendon Internal rotation and with the patient's hand behind the back with extreme internal rotation for the supraspinatus tendon Flexion and adduction for infraspinatus and teres minor tendons ‐ Criteria for a positive result: Six US signs were used: non‐visualisation; Floating bright spots Focal depression Focal thinning Focal hypoechoic cleft Focal heterogeneous hypoechogenicity ‐ Time from symptoms to index test: Not reported ‐ Time from index test to reference standard: within 1 month |
|
Follow‐up |
Adverse events due to index test(s): Not reported Adverse events due to reference standard test(s): Not reported |
|
Notes | A two‐by‐two table of the ITs and RS was given which tallied with the reported summary data | |
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Unclear | Population was patients with suspected of having any rotator cuff tears The study was prospective It was unclear whether consecutive recruitment |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Unclear | The reference standard was open surgery and the target condition was presence of any rotator cuff tears |
Acceptable delay between tests? All tests | Yes | The reference standard was performed within 1 month after the index test |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All patients who received the index test went on to receive verification of their disease status using a reference standard |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All patients received the same reference standard regardless of the result of their index test |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | The index test did not form part of the reference standard |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | The index tests were interpreted before and without knowledge of the reference standard results |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | No | The results of the index tests were known to the person interpreting the reference tests |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Unclear | Not reported |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | Yes | The study was prospective and results were reported for all initially included participants |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | Yes | No participants were excluded from the analysis |
Learning curve / training reported of index test? All tests | Unclear | All of the procedures were performed by one sonologist and the findings were interpreted by two or three sonologists in consensus prior to surgery |
Learning curve / training reported of reference standard? All tests | Unclear | Insufficient information was given to permit judgement |
Index test criteria for a positive test result reported? All tests | Yes | The study reported the definition of a positive index test result |
<: less than >: more than IT: Index test MHz: Megahertz RS: Reference standard T: Tesla T1‐weighted: Short TR and short TE sequences T2‐weighted: Long TR and long TE sequences TE: Echo time TR: Repetition time