Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 24;2013(9):CD009020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2

Yen 2004.

Clinical features and settings Inclusion criteria: Patients with shoulder pain and suspected of rotator cuff tears
Exclusion criteria: Not reported
Duration of symptoms: Not reported
Previous treatments: Not reported
Care setting: Not reported
Participants Place of study: Taiwan, China
Period of study: Not reported
Number of participants eligible: 50 participants
Number of participants enrolled IT and RS:
‐ US and open surgery: 50
Data available for analyses:
‐ US and open surgery: 50
Age: mean 63 years (range 17 to 81 years)
Male/Female: 26/24
Dominant arm: Not reported
Nature of onset: Not reported
Study design Primary objective: To prospectively compare the US and operative findings of rotator cuff tears
Study design: Prospective accuracy cohort study
Unclear whether consecutive recruitment
Language: English
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target conditions: Presence any rotator cuff tears
Reference standard(s): Open surgery
Description of technique: Not reported
Criteria for a positive result: Not reported
Index and comparator tests Index test(s): US
Description of technique:
Scanner: 7 MHz linear transducer
Technique: Longitudinal, transverse and oblique scans of the tendons were used
Patient position: Probably patient seated with the arm in
External rotation for scanning the subscapularis tendon
Neutral position for the long head of the biceps tendon
Internal rotation and with the patient's hand behind the back with extreme internal rotation for the supraspinatus tendon
Flexion and adduction for infraspinatus and teres minor tendons
Criteria for a positive result:
Six US signs were used: non‐visualisation;
Floating bright spots
Focal depression
Focal thinning
Focal hypoechoic cleft
Focal heterogeneous hypoechogenicity
Time from symptoms to index test: Not reported
Time from index test to reference standard: within 1 month
Follow‐up Adverse events due to index test(s): Not reported
Adverse events due to reference standard test(s): Not reported
Notes A two‐by‐two table of the ITs and RS was given which tallied with the reported summary data
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Unclear Population was patients with suspected of having any rotator cuff tears
The study was prospective
It was unclear whether consecutive recruitment
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Unclear The reference standard was open surgery and the target condition was presence of any rotator cuff tears
Acceptable delay between tests? 
 All tests Yes The reference standard was performed within 1 month after the index test
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All patients who received the index test went on to receive verification of their disease status using a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All patients received the same reference standard regardless of the result of their index test
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes The index test did not form part of the reference standard
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes The index tests were interpreted before and without knowledge of the reference standard results
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No The results of the index tests were known to the person interpreting the reference tests
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Unclear Not reported
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests Yes The study was prospective and results were reported for all initially included participants
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests Yes No participants were excluded from the analysis
Learning curve / training reported of index test? 
 All tests Unclear All of the procedures were performed by one sonologist and the findings were interpreted by two or three sonologists in consensus prior to surgery
Learning curve / training reported of reference standard? 
 All tests Unclear Insufficient information was given to permit judgement
Index test criteria for a positive test result reported? 
 All tests Yes The study reported the definition of a positive index test result

<: less than
 >: more than
 IT: Index test
 MHz: Megahertz
 RS: Reference standard
 T: Tesla
 T1‐weighted: Short TR and short TE sequences
 T2‐weighted: Long TR and long TE sequences
 TE: Echo time
 TR: Repetition time