Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;2016(3):CD003316. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub6

Park 2011

Methods Design: randomised, single‐blind trial of cardiorespiratory training plus usual care versus usual care ‐ during usual care
Randomisation mechanism: participants blindly pick 1 of 2 cards
Allocation concealment: envelopes used
Blinding: outcome assessor blind to group allocation
ITT: not reported
Measurements: end of intervention (4 weeks)
Withdrawals: 2 participants (1 from both intervention and control groups) not regularly participating
Participants Randomised: 27 participants
Intervention: 14 participants; 7 males and 6 females; mean age 59.4 years (SD 8.5)
Control: 13 participants; 5 males and 7 females; mean age 56.9 years (SD 7.8)
Inclusion criteria: 6 months to 5 years post first stroke; walking speed < 0.7 m/s
Exclusion criteria: auditory or visual deficits; no orthopaedic or cardiovascular conditions; cognitive impairment (> 25 MMSE score)
Interventions Invention group: 4‐phased walking training programme (progressing 150 metres to 200 metres to 300 metres to 500 metres) 1 hour 3 times/week for 4 weeks
Control group: usual physiotherapy care 1 hour daily based on Bobath concept
Setting: community based
Outcomes Included outcomes: 10 metre Walk Test; 6‐MWT; Community Walk test
Other outcomes: walking ability questionnaire; activities‐specific balance confidence scale
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Participants drew 1 of 2 cards from an envelope
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Envelopes used; nature of concealment unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk No attention control
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Person assessing outcome and analysing data blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) End of intervention Low risk ITT analysis not reported
2/27 (7%) lost at the end of intervention: 1 from intervention and 1 from control groups (not regularly participating)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol available
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear
Imbalanced exposure High risk Imbalanced exposure