Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;2016(3):CD003316. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub6

Potempa 1995

Methods Design: randomised trial of cardiorespiratory training versus non‐exercise intervention ‐ after usual care Randomisation: unknown Allocation concealment: unknown Blinding: unknown ITT: no
Measurements: end of intervention (10 weeks) Withdrawals: none
Participants Randomised: 42 participants Intervention: 19 participants; 8 males and 11 females Control: 23 participants; 15 males and 8 females
All participants aged 43 to 70 years and were 216 days post‐stroke (SD 43) All participants had upper and lower limb hemiparesis Inclusion criteria: medically stable; at least 6 months post‐stroke; completed formal rehabilitation Exclusion criteria: patients with brain stem lesions; any clinical evidence that would preclude maximal exercise testing
Interventions Intervention: cardiorespiratory training: cycle ergometer training for 30 minutes per day 3 days per week for 10 weeks; intensity 30% to 50% of maximal effort increasing to maximum sustainable over first 4 weeks Control: non‐exercise intervention: passive range of motion exercises for 30 minutes per day 3 days per week for 10 weeks Setting: unknown
Outcomes Included outcomes: blood pressure; maximum cycling work rate (Watts) Other outcomes: heart rate at rest and during maximal exercise; respiratory exchange rate and other respiratory variables; exercise duration; Fugl Meyer score
Notes Variance reported as standard error and converted to standard deviation.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Attention control
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) End of intervention Low risk ITT not reported
No losses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not available
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear
Imbalanced exposure Low risk Balanced exposure