Skip to main content
. 2014 May 15;2014(5):CD003948. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003948.pub3

Leonard 2001.

Methods Double‐blind, placebo controlled, multi‐centred trial.
Participants 52 female patients, > 18 years old. Inclusion criteria: confirmed breast cancer with superficial, or flat, skin lesions where the estimated depth of invasion below skin level was ≤ 1cm. All participants had received at least 1 prior systemic endocrine or chemotherapy treatment. Participants required adequate bone marrow status, and renal and hepatic function, to ensure that those at risk of requiring systemic therapeutic interventions ‐ due to concomitant or incipient visceral disease ‐ were excluded. Exclusion criteria: skin lesions manageable with surgery, radiotherapy, systemic endocrine therapy or chemotherapy; progressive systemic metastases, or other malignancies within the last five years (except treated and cured cervical carcinoma in situ, non melanoma skin cancer or cutaneous lymphoepithelioma); recent major surgery; concomitant treatment with other investigational drugs; uncontrolled clinically‐significant non‐cancer medical illness; and those who were lactating, pregnant, or had childbearing potential and were not taking adequate contraceptive precautions.
Interventions 6% miltefosine solution 2 drops/10 cm2 of skin area including the affected skin and a margin of 3cm around each lesion, once daily during first week and twice daily thereafter.
Outcomes Quality of life.
 Tumour containment/remission.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The report states that this is a 'placebo controlled ...trial' but the method of generating the randomisation sequence was not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 outcome assessment Low risk Participants, clinicians and outcome assessors were blinded. ("The placebo was plyethene glycol solution, having a similar appearance and viscosity" and "All responses were assessed by an independent reviewer before the randomization codes were unblinded.")
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The report states that an ITT analysis was conducted. There were 9 withdrawals.