Elbadawy 2014.
Methods | Single‐centre parallel randomised controlled 3‐arm trial Setting: Department of Critical Care Medicine, Egypt Sample size; minimum sample size required was 20 patients for each group to achieve a power of 80 % and alpha of 0.05. |
|
Participants | 60 participants, with closed traumatic severe brain injury in need for prolonged MV who continued to have a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of less than 8 after initial stabiliSation of their haemodynamic and oxygenation. Mean age not available. Gender (male/female ratio): NGT + intubation: 8/12 PEG + intubation: 9/11 PEG + tracheostomy: 11/9 Exclusion criteria: History of known respiratory disease, thoracic trauma, multiple traumatic injuries including abdominal or spinal trauma, massive or untreatable loculated ascites, previous abdominal surgery, uncorrected coagulopathy. |
|
Interventions |
NGT + intubation (n = 20): nasogastric tube and endotracheal tube was inserted through which MV was applied. PEG + intubation (n = 20): PEG was done within 24 hours of endotracheal intubation using percutaneous pull gastrostomy kit using Bard Ponsky pull through technique PEG + tracheostomy (n = 20): percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and PEG were done within 24 hours of endotracheal intubation. In all study groups, bolus enteral nutrition was given which was initiated within 24 hours after intubation for patients in group (A) and 24 hours after performance of gastrostomy for group (B and C). All the patients were nursed in a semi recumbent position (30‐45o). Proton pump inhibitor was given intravenously for stress ulcer prophylaxis (pantoprazole 40mg once daily) for each patient in all the study groups |
|
Outcomes | Primary
Secondary
Adverse events including: infection of tracheostomy wound, bleeding from tracheostomy, pneumothorax, tracheo‐oesophageal fistula, infection of gastrostomy wound, GIT Fistula, GIT Perforation, buried pumper syndrome (PEG tube erodes and migrates through the gastric wall), paranasal sinusitis. |
|
Notes | No statistically or clinically significant differences between comparison groups at baseline for gender, mechanism of injury, characteristics based on computer tomography, APACHE II score, Glasgow coma score, or other vital sign sand biochemical parameters. We combined data for the PEG + intubation and PEG + tracheostomy groups into a single PEG group for comparison with NGT. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Described as randomised, consecutive computer randomisation (further information from study investigator) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not concealed (further information from study investigator) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible for this type of intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not explicitly stated by the study investigators |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No attrition reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Relevant outcomes were analysed, protocol not available for assessment |
Other bias | Low risk | None |