Clifford 2012.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, DB, parallel groups, single application, 12‐week duration. Patches applied to both feet, up to 1120 cm2 Oral pain medication continued without change. Transdermal opioids (morphine equivalent ≤ 80 mg/day) permitted, but not topical analgesics, or implanted medical device for pain relief Rescue medication: during application participants allowed oral oxycodone solution (1 mg/mL) and local cooling; after application allowed hydrocodone/paracetamol (5/500 mg) for ≤ 5 days, and paracetamol (≤ 3 g/day) throughout Pain assessed daily (average pain for last 24 hours). PGIC assessed at 12 weeks. Clinic visits at 4, 8, 12 weeks |
|
Participants | HIV‐associated distal sensory neuropathy for ≥ 2 months Exclusion: previous use of NGX‐4010 (capsaicin) N = 494 M = 432, F = 62 Mean age: 50 years Baseline pain: 30 mm to 90 mm (mean 60 mm) |
|
Interventions | (1) Capsaicin patch 8% 30 min, n = 167 (2) Capsaicin patch 8% 60 min, n = 165 (3) Placebo patch 30 min, n = 73 (4) Placebo patch 60 min, n = 89 Topical local anaesthetic applied for 60 min, then patch applied for 30 or 60 min Control patch contained 0.04% capsaicin to mimic AEs |
|
Outcomes | PI: 11‐point numeric pain rating scale (responder: ≥ 30% reduction from baseline) PGIC: 7‐point scale (reporting: slightly, much and very much improved) AEs Withdrawals |
|
Notes | Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described; "allocation scheme prepared by Fisher Clinical Services" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described as identical; "low‐dose capsaicin control patches were used instead of placebo to provide effective blinding ..." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Modified LOCF analysis for primary outcome, but no imputation for weekly scores. All participants included for safety analysis |
Size | Unclear risk | 50 to 200 participants per treatment arm. |