Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 26;2015(2):CD011548. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011548

Admassie 2005.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Type of study: retrospective.
 Consecutive or random sample: unclear.
Patient characteristics and setting Sample size: 49.
Females: 34 (69.4%).
Age: 50 years.
Presentation:
Inclusion criteria:
  1. People undergoing surgery for obstructive jaundice.


Setting: Surgery Department, Ethiopia.
Index tests Index test: ultrasound.
 Technical specifications: not stated.
 Performed by: not stated.
 Criteria for positive diagnosis: not stated.
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: common bile duct stones.
 Reference standard: surgical confirmation of cause for obstructive jaundice.
 Technical specifications: not applicable.
 Performed by: surgeons.
 Criteria for positive diagnosis: surgical confirmation of cause for obstructive jaundice.
Flow and timing Number of indeterminates for whom the results of reference standard was available: not stated.
 Number of participants who were excluded from the analysis: not stated.
Comparative  
Notes Attempted to contact the authors in June 2013. Received no replies.
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
    High Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
    High High
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
    High High
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Unclear    
    Unclear