EARTS Study 1999.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Placebo
17 patients across both groups got ATG for DGF |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | 'Performed in blocks of 6 to ensure balanced distribution of treatment per centre' |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blinded; pathologist reviewing biopsies for suspected acute rejection was also blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patient outcome data reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All expected outcomes reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Appears free from other bias but funding source not declared |