Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 11;2017(1):CD004759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004759.pub2

Sharaf El Din 2006.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RC; possibly 3:1 however not well described

  • Study duration: not reported

  • Study follow‐up: 1 year

Participants
  • Country: Egypt

  • Setting: single centre

  • Inclusion criteria: LD kidney transplant recipients

  • Number: treatment group (63); control group (20)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): not reported

  • Sex (M/F): not reported

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Alemtuzumab: 20 mg, 2 doses day 0 and day 1

  • MP: 250 mg prior to each treatment

  • CSA: 4 mg/kg/d from day 1

  • MMF: 500 mg twice daily from day 1


Control group
  • MP: 250 mg in operating theatre at induction and at declamping

  • PRED: with gradual decrease to 10 mg/d by 3 months

  • CSA: 8 mg/kg/d from day 2

  • MMF: 1 g twice daily from day 2

Outcomes
  • Patient survival

  • Graft survival

  • Acute rejection

  • SCr

Notes
  • Abstract‐only publication

  • Not clear if randomised but states that it was

  • Attempted to contact author to clarify methods but no response

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Unlikely to influence outcomes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not clear if acute rejection was biopsy‐proven
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement