Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD008449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub2

Cacchio 2009a

Methods RCT
Participants Country: Italy
Sample size: 48 participants (24 in each group; 6 dropped out post‐treatment, 3 more dropped out after 6 months)
Inclusion criteria: hemiparesis after first ever ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke; during first 6 months post‐stroke; diagnosed with CRPS‐type 1 with a VAS pain score > 4 cm
Exclusion criteria: an intra‐articular injection into the affected shoulder during the previous 6 months or use of systemic corticosteroids during the previous 4 months; presence of another explanation of pain; prior surgery to shoulder or neck; serious uncontrolled medical conditions; global aphasia or cognitive impairments; visual impairments which might interfere with the aims of the study; evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse; or severe depression
Interventions 2 arms: 4‐week conventional stroke rehabilitation programme and additional
  1. mirror therapy: participants performed upper extremity movements while looking in the mirror, without additional verbal feedback

  2. sham therapy: patients performed the same treatment protocol as in group 1 but with covering the reflecting side of the mirror


1 and 2: 5 days a week, 30 minutes of therapy for the first 2 weeks; and 5 days a week, 60 minutes of therapy for the last 2 weeks
Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline, 1 week after the intervention period and after 6 months
  • WMFT/FA; 0 to 5, lower scores indicating better functioning

  • WMFT/PT; in seconds

  • QOM item in the MAL (0 to 5)

  • Pain at rest (VAS 0 to 10)

  • Pain on movement (VAS 0 to 10)

  • Pain tactile allodynia (VAS 0 to 10)

Notes Published and unpublished data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Patients were randomly allocated (authors' statement)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
ITT analysis Low risk Results were analysed on an ITT basis
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) primary outcome Low risk Assessors were blinded to group allocation