Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD008449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub2

Seok 2010

Methods RCT
Participants Country: South Korea
Sample size: 40 participants (19 in mirror therapy group, 21 in control group)
Inclusion criteria: stroke within 6 months
Exclusion criteria: not able to understand treatment instructions; communication difficulties due to aphasia; MMSE < 15 points; musculoskeletal or neurological damage of the unaffected upperextremity; modified Ashworth Scale of 3 or more points; Brunnstrom stage of recovery (arm) of 1 or more than 5 points
Interventions 2 arms:
  1. mirror therapy

  2. no additional therapy


1 and 2: 5 days a week, 30 minutes of therapy for 4 weeks
Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
  • MFT

  • MMT

  • Grip strength

Notes Published data only, extracted in part on the basis of an unauthorised, automatic translation of the original publication in Korean
Significant difference in MFT between groups at baseline measurement
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated random number sequence
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
ITT analysis Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) primary outcome Low risk Assessors were blinded to group allocation