Seok 2010
| Methods | RCT | |
| Participants | Country: South Korea Sample size: 40 participants (19 in mirror therapy group, 21 in control group) Inclusion criteria: stroke within 6 months Exclusion criteria: not able to understand treatment instructions; communication difficulties due to aphasia; MMSE < 15 points; musculoskeletal or neurological damage of the unaffected upperextremity; modified Ashworth Scale of 3 or more points; Brunnstrom stage of recovery (arm) of 1 or more than 5 points |
|
| Interventions | 2 arms:
1 and 2: 5 days a week, 30 minutes of therapy for 4 weeks |
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
| Notes | Published data only, extracted in part on the basis of an unauthorised, automatic translation of the original publication in Korean Significant difference in MFT between groups at baseline measurement |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated random number sequence |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| ITT analysis | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) primary outcome | Low risk | Assessors were blinded to group allocation |