Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD007277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007277.pub2

Comparison 4. Abatacept versus placebo (by dosage).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 ACR 20% improvement 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 6 months ‐ 2 mg/kg 1 121 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.58 [0.92, 2.71]
1.2 6 months ‐ 10 mg/kg 4 1527 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.81 [1.60, 2.04]
1.3 6 months ‐ combined dosage 5 1648 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.79 [1.59, 2.02]
2 ACR 50% improvement 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 6 months ‐ 2 mg/kg 1 121 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.63, 2.83]
2.2 6 months ‐ 10 mg/kg 4 1527 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.59 [2.07, 3.25]
2.3 6 months ‐ combined dosage 5 1648 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.47 [2.00, 3.07]
3 ACR 70% improvement 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 6 months ‐ 2 mg/kg 1 121 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 8.17 [0.49, 136.81]
3.2 6 months ‐ 10 mg/kg 4 1527 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.43 [2.34, 5.04]
3.3 6 months ‐ combined dosage 5 1648 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.53 [2.41, 5.16]