Richards 2004
| Methods | RCT Method of randomisation: stratified randomisation with random permuted blocks and random block size Blinding of outcome assessors: yes Adverse events: not reported Deaths: not reported Drop outs: 15 (7 in EXP group, 8 in CTL group) ITT: yes | |
| Participants | Country: Canada 63 participants (32 in EXP group, 31 in CTL group) Ambulatory at study onset Mean age: 61 to 63 years (CTL and EXP group respectively) Inclusion criteria: age between 30 and 89 years, with first or second episode of ischaemic stroke with residual deficit, Barthel Ambulation Subscore > 10, gait speed between 0.1 and 0.6 m/s Exclusion criteria: haemorrhagic stroke, ability to understand and follow verbal instructions, major medical problems (diabetes, cancer, aphasia, orthopaedic disorders) interfering with the intervention | |
| Interventions | 2 arms:
|
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes were recorded at baseline, at the end of the intervention phase and 3 months later Primary outcomes: gait speed by walking 5 metres, 10 metres or 30 metres at preferred speed Secondary outcomes: lower extremity function (FMA), Timed Up and Go, Functional Independence (Barthel Ambulation Subscore) | |
| Notes | Contamination addressed in the study design by issues of location and personnel | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Stratified randomisation with random permuted blocks and random block size |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | After randomisation, treating therapists were informed about assignment |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome assessor was blinded to group assignment |