Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 27;2016(6):CD002787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002787.pub3

Comparison 1. Mortality: INO versus control group.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Overall mortality: INO vs control 13 1243 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.90, 1.19]
2 28‐ to 30‐day mortality: INO vs control 9 1105 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.92, 1.27]
3 Mortality: subgroup analysis, paediatric vs adult population 13 1243 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.90, 1.19]
3.1 Paediatric 3 185 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.51, 1.18]
3.2 Adult 10 1058 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.93, 1.25]
4 Mortality: subgroup analysis based on duration of drug administration 12 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.92, 1.22]
4.1 Shorter than median duration of INO 5 394 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.84, 1.29]
4.2 Longer than median duration of INO 7 796 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.89, 1.29]
5 Sensitivity analysis: excluding abstracts, INO vs control 11 1021 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.87, 1.21]
6 Sensitivity analysis: excluding trials not fulfilling AECC criteria, INO vs control 10 834 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.92, 1.26]